Agency vs freelancer
Both can build you a good website and both can waste your money. The difference is usually not skill, it is what happens after the site goes live.
A good freelancer is cheaper, faster to reach and often more personally invested in the work. For a simple site with a clear brief this is frequently the sensible choice.
The risk is continuity. One person gets sick, takes a full-time job or stops replying, and your site, hosting login and domain go quiet with them. That risk is small on day one and large in year three.
An agency brings a team, a process and someone who answers when the original builder is unavailable. Bigger agencies also bring account managers, longer timelines and prices that reflect their overheads.
The risk is distance. You brief a salesperson, a project manager relays it, and the person building the site never speaks to you.
We are deliberately in between. Small enough that you talk directly to the people building your site, structured enough that the domain, hosting, backups and support do not depend on one person's availability.
That is why our turnaround is measured in days rather than months, and why there is no lock-in contract holding you in place.
Usually on the initial build, yes. The cost difference tends to appear later, in support response times and in what happens when the site needs changing quickly.
With us, you do. You own the domain, the content and the site, and you are not locked into a monthly licence to keep using what you paid for.
Ask who owns the domain, who holds the hosting login, what the turnaround is for a small change, and what happens if the person who built it becomes unavailable.
Tell us what you need. We will come back with clear questions, a practical recommendation and the next step.
Fill in your details and we'll open a WhatsApp chat so you can reach us directly.
